This data was used to produce graphs presented in the article by Daniel Groll, Thilo Hahn, Paweł Machnikowski, Tilmann Kuhn, Jacek Kasprzak and Daniel Wigger. That was published in Nano Futures 9 042601 (2025).
The archive contains the experimental data used to create the figures presented in the publication.
The data correspond to the figures 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 39 and 43.
Fig.21 presents the FWM amplitude map measured on a BN-encapsulated MoSe2 monolayer.
Fig.23 presents spectrometer CCD images of beams E1 and Ref in several configurations - defocused, focused, diffracted from mixing AOM, energy-dispersed horizontally and spectral interferometry (homodyning of E1 and Ref beams).
Fig.24 presents image from CCD and the binning of upper and lower halfs of the image into two bins.
Fig.25 presents the binned data for upper and lower CCD tracks with the application of a 0-phase shift and a pi-phase shift to the mixing AOM.
Fig.26 presents the spectral interferogram measured on an InAs quantum dot in a low-Q cavity, as well as its processing result i.e. the FWM amplitude and FWM phase spectra.
Fig.27 presents plots of homodyning interference between E1 and Ref beams as a function of the temporal delay between them. The plots differ by the entrance spectrometer slit width and selected diffraction grating.
Fig.29 presents three maps of 2D FWM spectroscopy. (a) of a CdTe quantum dot. (b) InAs quantum dot in a photonic wire. (c) exfoliated monolayer of MoSe2.
Fig.39 presents four maps of 2D FWM spectroscopy.
Fig.43 presents spectrometer response on the detection of a photon echo. It contains the FWM amplitude as a function of E1-E2 pulses delay.
All data is in CSV format (ASCII encoded).
For further information, please consult the readme.txt file in each folder.
